Prediction of Mary Mcilquham vs Elsa Haylock Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

M. Mcilquham vs E. Haylock

Mary Mcilquham
Mary Mcilquham

Flag GBR GBR

w
l
l
l
w
w
w
w
w
l
Elsa Haylock
Elsa Haylock

Flag GBR GBR

l
w
l
w
w
w
l
w
w
l

3

Win

4

Played

1

Win

124
Age
124
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Mcilquham 3 - 1 Haylock

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Mcilquham3
Haylock1
Last 0 H2H Matches:

No past h2h happened.

M. Mcilquham vs E. Haylock H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
77.54% (145-42)Career Total W/L65.64% (170-89)
0Clay1
3Grass0
3Total H2H Matches1
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

M. Mcilquham vs E. Haylock Match Preview:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mary Mcilquham has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Elsa Haylock has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mary Mcilquham, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Elsa Haylock has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Mary Mcilquham has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Elsa Haylock has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Mary Mcilquham has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Elsa Haylock winning 0% (W/L 0/) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Mary Mcilquham has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 90% (W/L 27/3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 24/16). Elsa Haylock has their best career surface win % on , winning 90% (W/L /), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L /).
  • Player level: In the last year, Mary Mcilquham has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Elsa Haylock has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with Mary Mcilquham winning 4 times and Elsa Haylock being victorious 1 times. They have played 13 sets in total, with Mary Mcilquham winning 9 and Elsa Haylock winning 4.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Mary Mcilquham and Elsa Haylock have played a deciding set 3 times, with Mary Mcilquham winning 2 times and Elsa Haylock 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mary Mcilquham has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Elsa Haylock has played against players with an average rank of 0.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mary Mcilquham has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Elsa Haylock has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Mary Mcilquham has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Elsa Haylock has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Mary Mcilquham vs Elsa Haylock Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Mcilquham vs E. Haylock H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
4H2H Matches Won1
9Sets Won4
71Games Won54
0:0:0Average Match Time0:0:0
80% (4/5)Best‑of‑3 Win %20% (1/5)
67% (2/3)Deciding Set Win %33% (1/3)
67% (2/3)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/2)
33% (1/3)1st Set Won, Lost Match100% (2/2)
100% (2/2)1st Set Lost, Won Match33% (1/3)

M. Mcilquham Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
N/ANewcastle - 29-07-1935

GBRS. Chuter
L
4-6 6-4 6-3
N/ANewcastle - 04-07-1932

F

GBRM. Stephens
W
6-1 6-2
GrassTorquay - 17-08-1931

F

GBRE. Haylock
W
4-6 6-1 6-2
GrassLlanelly - 03-08-1931

F

GBRD. Seel
W
6-4 6-1
GrassCheltenham - 13-07-1931

F

GBRD. White
W
6-4 6-0

E. Haylock Recent Matches Played

Empty Result
banner

M. Mcilquham vs E. Haylock Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
77.54% (145/42)YTD Win/Loss1st Match
73.97% (304/107)Sets Win/Loss1st Match
60.78% (2211/1427)Games Win/Loss1st Match
0% (0/0)Hard Win/Loss1st Match
60.00% (24/16)Clay Win/Loss1st Match
66.67% (2/1)Indoor Hard W/L1st Match
80.70% (92/22)Grass Win/Loss1st Match
0Aces Per Game1st Match
0Aces Total1st Match
0Double Faults Per Game1st Match
0Total Double Faults1st Match
1st MatchAverage Match Time1st Match
0Average Opponent Rank1st Match
0% (0/0)1st Serve %1st Match
0% (0/0)1st Serve Win %1st Match
0% (0/0)2nd Serve Win %1st Match
0% (0/0)Break Points Won % (Total)1st Match
0% (0/0)Return Points Win %1st Match
56.52% (13/10)Slam W/L1st Match
0% (0/0)Masters W/L1st Match
0% (0/0)Cups W/L1st Match
0% (0/0)Main Tour W/L1st Match
0% (0/0)Tour Finals W/L1st Match
0% (0/0)Challenger W/L1st Match
0% (0/0)Futures W/L1st Match
78% (141/180)Best of 3 Sets Win %1st Match
100% (1/1)Best of 5 Sets Win %1st Match
0% (0/0)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)1st Match
61% (28/46)Deciding Set Win %1st Match
92% (140/129)1st Set Won, Won Match1st Match
8% (140/11)1st Set Won, Lost Match1st Match
35% (43/15)1st Set Lost, Won Match1st Match

Other Tennis Predictions Today

08:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
LTUE. Butvilas
ESPM. A. Gurriq
W1
1.55
W2
2.26
03:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
ITAF. AndaloroALT
BIHN. Fatic
W1
2.24
W2
1.56
01:12 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
JPNS. Mochizuki1
ITAF. ArnaboldiLL
W1
1.138
W2
4.8
08:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
RUSS. Gulinq
FRAC. Tabur5
W1
2.88
W2
1.35
03:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
AUTS. Sorger
KAZD. Yevseyev
W1
2.4
W2
1.49
03:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
ITAF. Passaro4
ITAM. Ribecaiq
W1
1.172
W2
4.3